Petition for children’s mental health

Petition for Children’s Mental Health: Send a message to the Ontario provincial government
by Jennifer Forbes
Tuesday, May 01, 2007

The opportunity to demonstrate your support for 1 in 5 children and youth who are troubled by mental health issues, is still open. Life long mental health difficulties so often start in our young. With your help, our efforts to bring this issue the attention it needs can be achieved.

By May 13th, the end of Children’s Mental Health Week, we aim to have 5000 names on our petition.

So far we are almost 20% along and look for your help in moving this number up.

This petition will not only be sent to the heads of our provincial parties, we can use the strength of its numbers to bolster our messaging in upcoming meetings and other advocacy efforts.

If you have not already signed the petition, you still have time.

Thank you
Consumers and Advocates Committee of the Provincial Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Heath
Parents for Children’s Mental Health
Youth Net

children, parenting, mental health, Ontario, Canada

Crazy: A Father’s Search Through America’s Mental Health Madness

Pete Earley is an award-winning investigative reporter whose previous books have been about spies, prisons, and the witness protection program. To some degree, this background may have prepared him to write Crazy: A Father’s Search Through America’s Mental Health Madness, released April 20, 2004, but nothing ever prepares a person for the shock of mental illness.

“I had no idea,” Earley begins.

Diagnosed with bipolar disorder, Earley’s son, Mike, recently out of college, broke into a stranger’s house to take a bubble bath and vandalized the premises. Frustration with an inability to get Mike into treatment – including his son’s periodic refusals to take medication – as well as the legal procedures surrounding mental illness, caused Earley to use his journalism skills to explore the rapid cycling that exists today between hospitals, courthouses, and jails.

The result is a unique book -one of the best -that presents “criminalization of the mentally ill” not as an abstract concept, but as one drawn in vivid, human dimensions, accompanied by objective and pained reflection. The book alternates between his son’s story in Northern Virginia and Miami-Dade County, where he was able to gain unprecedented access to one of the nation’s largest jails and its psychiatric ward, where guards freely admit to beating patients because, said one, “They’re criminals first, mentally ill second.”

Earley follows the lives of individual consumers, and talks with them and their families, both inside and outside the jail.

At one point, he interviews the parents of Robbie Sherman, a former Boy Scout, whom police had shot and killed during a manic episode. Robbie’s mother showed him a photograph of her son in a 5×7 frame. “I loved my son. Why did this have to happen,” she cried. “Why did they have to shoot him? Why wouldn’t anyone listen to me when I told them he was sick?”

“I looked at the photograph of Robbie in the gold frame,” Earley writes. “The teenager smiling at me could have been anyone’s son. He could have been Mike.” Indeed, that is one of two key points Earley hopes to make with the book to educate the public: that mental illness can and does strike anyone.

Earley’s other point is that jails have not only become our “new asylums”, but in fact are becoming “institutionalized” as part of a “continuum of care”. No metaphor seems terrible enough to convey what that means. Consumers who run afoul of the law may face an endless maze of cruel choices or dead ends. They may be sent to state or county psychiatric facilities to be “made competent”, with minimal treatment, to stand trial. By the time they are shuttled back to jail and appear in court, they may have decompensated to a state of incompetence again and therefore be sent back for more “treatment”. Treatment in jail may occur in name only. From both hospitals and jails, there often is little, if any, realistic discharge planning, and the community services which discharged consumers need too often are inadequate or non-existent.

Other obstacles to recovery exist, even when a consumer is relatively lucky.

In the case of Earley’s son, the owner of the house he broke into initially insisted that Mike plead guilty to a felony – which would have ruined any chance he might have had for getting a professional license to pursue his career. Even after being convicted only of a misdemeanor, Mike lost a job because his employer discovered that he was on probation. Never mind the fact that he had disclosed the conviction on his job application.

A principal focus in Earley’s discussion is the tension between the consumer’s right to treatment, the right to refuse treatment, and the frustration of family members or mental health professionals who want to insist on treatment.

Introducing Earley to Freddie Gilbert, one of the consumers whose cases he decides to follow, a doctor observes: “He’s been in this jail before and we know he responds well to medication. The last time he was here, we got him into treatment and he thanked us later. But now the law is forcing us to stand back and do nothing while he continues to get worse. If this man’s arm was fractured, we’d be accused of negligence and cruelty if we didn’t help him. But because he’s mentally ill, we’re not supposed to interfere until he asks.”

As a father, Earley’s sentiments on requiring treatment are clear, but he pursues the issue objectively in posing questions and establishing historical perspective that can inform all points of view. He also is supported by his son’s insistence that he write the book and use his real name, “if it would help other people understand”, despite their differences over medication.

Earley also investigates the fate of Deidra Sanbourne, whose class action lawsuit against the State of Florida caused her to be released from a state hospital after 20 years, and uncovers “an ugly truth”. After being warehoused for 20 years in a state hospital, Sanbourne ended up warehoused in a squalid boarding home, where her condition only worsened, until her death. It is that truth to which the book speaks.

“In Crazy, Earley provides a remarkable and fresh look at the US mental health system. He does so in a balanced, honest, self-reflective, and informed way. Crazy offers a unique and sensitive perspective on questions America is reluctant to address. It should be required reading for psychiatry residents, forensic fellows, and any psychiatrist interested in public sector psychiatry …

Placing his argument in historical context, he describes deinstitutionalization as a well-intentioned but poorly reasoned outgrowth of the antipsychiatry movement, which began in the 1960s … Earley describes deinstitutionalization as an “unplanned social disaster,” which … has created an environment as abusive to the mentally ill as the dreaded state hospitals of the past … Earley poignantly reflects on a society that accepts homelessness as a civil right …”
Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), January 2, 2007

Read the first chapter of Crazy at

bipolar disorder, criminalization of mental illness, criminalization of the mentally ill, health care, manic depression, mental health, mental illness

Pets as Serotonin Boosters

Puppy Love: Pets and serotonin

There have been indications for some time from anectdotal reports and research that people, especially seniors, who live with a pet (usually a dog or a cat) are healthier, happier, and recover more rapidly from illness. A common assumption has been that this is the result of a combination of the required increased activity in caring for the pet, and the companionship provided by another living thing. This article points to another reason…

Puppy Love
July 21, 2004
by Karen Lurie, ScienCentral

Any dog owner can tell you about the benefits of spending time with a furry friend. But now there’s some science to back it up.  ‘We have known for a long time that people like to interact with dogs and that it makes them feel happy and they enjoy it,’ says Rebecca Johnson, a gerontologist at University of Missouri-Columbia’s Sinclair School of Nursing. ‘But it’s important to know how this affects the changes in their bloodstream, so we can see which patients might be the best to benefit from this kind of interaction.’

In her on-going study, Johnson asks 50 dog owners and 50 non-pet owners, with ages ranging from 19 to 73, to play with a live dog and a robot dog. Before and after the interactions, she draws blood samples from human and dog, to compare hormone levels. ‘One of the hormones that we are interested in, which is called serotonin, is the hormone that controls depression in people,’ Johnson explains.

Johnson’s preliminary results show that serotonin increases when people pet their own dogs. ‘We think this is very important because of the large numbers of people in this country and abroad that are depressed, particularly the elderly, that we think may benefit from this kind of interaction,’ says Johnson. However, interaction with an unfamiliar dog didn’t affect serotonin levels. When it came to the robotic dog, serotonin levels actually dropped.

The dogs in the study all benefited from human interaction, whether they previously knew the person or not. Veterinarian Richard Meadows measured the dogs’ blood pressure and blood hormone levels during the test period. “It’s both good for the dog and it’s good for the person, and this appears at this state to be almost universally true,” he says.

pets, pet therapy, depression, mental health